Costa Rican vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Costa Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Costa Ricans

New Zealanders

Average
Excellent
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Costa Rican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,583,257 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 New Zealanders.
Costa Rican Integration in New Zealander Communities

Costa Rican vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,090 compared to $50,575, a difference of 14.7%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $61,199, a difference of 12.8%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $115,230, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.36%), median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $42,446, a difference of 7.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $111,286, a difference of 8.3%).
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricCosta RicanNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,090
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Good
$103,989
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,262
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Average
$46,645
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,279
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,622
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,106
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,565
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,779
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,638
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
27.7%

Costa Rican vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricCosta RicanNew Zealander
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Average
29.0%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Costa Rican vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCosta RicanNew Zealander
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Good
5.3%

Costa Rican vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCosta RicanNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Fair
82.6%

Costa Rican vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.060%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCosta RicanNew Zealander
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.7%
Excellent
30.3%

Costa Rican vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.92%).
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCosta RicanNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.9%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
6.5%

Costa Rican vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 33.2%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricCosta RicanNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.4%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.7%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.5%

Costa Rican vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.050%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Costa Rican vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricCosta RicanNew Zealander
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Good
11.0%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.9%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%