Immigrants from Israel vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,791,693 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.840. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.235% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 235.4 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $50,575, a difference of 13.5%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $61,199, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $105,085, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $67,333, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $53,294, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.6%), single female poverty (18.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.31%), male poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.89%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 52.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.9%), master's degree (22.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.25%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.5% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.65%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.3%).