Hawaiian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,775,474 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 16.0 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $50,575, a difference of 28.3%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $61,199, a difference of 21.2%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $51,246, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.41%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $67,333, a difference of 3.7%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.35%), single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.8%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 73.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 71.3%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.6%).