Native/Alaskan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,983,619 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 5.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $50,575, a difference of 52.0%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $115,230, a difference of 42.4%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $95,146, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $53,294, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $42,446, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 84.2%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 76.3%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.2%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 25.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 32.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 63.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.3%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.8%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.8%), family households (66.4% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 101.5%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 89.2%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 84.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.1%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.8%).