Malaysian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,302,227 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 7.4 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $50,575, a difference of 29.0%), median family income ($95,230 compared to $115,230, a difference of 21.0%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $61,199, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $53,294, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $42,446, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 28.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.6%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.0%), currently married (45.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 32.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 75.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 72.1%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.6%).