Immigrants from Malaysia vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,125,852 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.156% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 155.6 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.4%), median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $42,446, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $67,333, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($115,880 compared to $115,230, a difference of 0.56%), per capita income ($49,983 compared to $50,575, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($96,292 compared to $95,146, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.7%), single male poverty (12.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.9%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (47.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 40.0%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.48%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.9%).