Ecuadorian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,164,469 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 9.2 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $67,333, a difference of 22.5%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $115,230, a difference of 21.1%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $42,446, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $51,246, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 50.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 46.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.78%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 123.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 45.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 15.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 44.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 76.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 71.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 26.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%).