Immigrants from Chile vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,238,186 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.974. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 57.4 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $50,575, a difference of 9.4%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $61,199, a difference of 9.4%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $115,230, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $42,446, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $51,246, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.20%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.69%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 8.2%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.63%).