Marshallese vs New Zealander Community Comparison

COMPARE

Marshallese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Marshallese

New Zealanders

Fair
Excellent
2,873
SOCIAL INDEX
26.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
240th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

New Zealander Integration in Marshallese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,699,597 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to an increase of 14.6 New Zealanders.
Marshallese Integration in New Zealander Communities

Marshallese vs New Zealander Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,108 compared to $50,575, a difference of 29.3%), median male earnings ($48,137 compared to $61,199, a difference of 27.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,575 compared to $105,085, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $67,333, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.3%), and median female earnings ($36,459 compared to $42,446, a difference of 16.4%).
Marshallese vs New Zealander Income
Income MetricMarshalleseNew Zealander
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,108
Exceptional
$50,575
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,293
Exceptional
$115,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,930
Exceptional
$95,146
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,969
Exceptional
$51,246
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,137
Exceptional
$61,199
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,459
Exceptional
$42,446
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,627
Exceptional
$53,294
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,575
Exceptional
$105,085
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,455
Exceptional
$111,286
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,874
Exceptional
$67,333
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.4%
Tragic
27.7%

Marshallese vs New Zealander Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 42.0%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Marshallese vs New Zealander Poverty
Poverty MetricMarshalleseNew Zealander
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.3%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.7%
Good
16.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
15.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Poor
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
23.3%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.1%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.9%

Marshallese vs New Zealander Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 33.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Marshallese vs New Zealander Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMarshalleseNew Zealander
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Good
5.3%

Marshallese vs New Zealander Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Marshallese vs New Zealander Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMarshalleseNew Zealander
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.2%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.4%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.3%
Fair
82.6%

Marshallese vs New Zealander Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.4%), births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (63.7% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Marshallese vs New Zealander Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMarshalleseNew Zealander
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
62.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
27.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.38
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.5%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.8%
Excellent
30.3%

Marshallese vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Marshallese vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMarshalleseNew Zealander
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.9%
Exceptional
56.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.3%
Exceptional
20.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
6.5%

Marshallese vs New Zealander Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 71.6%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 58.7%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
Marshallese vs New Zealander Education Level
Education Level MetricMarshalleseNew Zealander
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
70.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
51.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.5%

Marshallese vs New Zealander Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.0%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Marshallese vs New Zealander Disability
Disability MetricMarshalleseNew Zealander
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Fair
17.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%