Bermudan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,831,829 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.340. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.112% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 111.5 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $105,085, a difference of 19.1%), and median household income ($80,406 compared to $95,146, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $42,446, a difference of 7.7%), median earnings ($45,593 compared to $51,246, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $53,294, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.7%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.6%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and married-couple households (42.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 25.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.8%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%), 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.8%).