Immigrants from Oceania vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,356,009 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.112% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 112.0 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $50,575, a difference of 11.8%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $61,199, a difference of 9.9%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $115,230, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.72%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $67,333, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $42,446, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.61%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.15, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.62%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.33%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 34.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.86%).