Immigrants from Sweden vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,689,682 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.896. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.197% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 1,197.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $50,575, a difference of 9.9%), median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $61,199, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $105,085, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.61%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $67,333, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.91%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.55%), and family households (62.5% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%).