Immigrants from Philippines vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,729,162 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,000 compared to $50,575, a difference of 14.9%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $61,199, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($93,899 compared to $95,146, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,161 compared to $67,333, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $105,085, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 30.1%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and single father poverty (14.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.78%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.7%), family households (68.3% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.8%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 53.6%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.5%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.25%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%).