Asian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,701,936 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to an increase of 0.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $105,085, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $53,294, a difference of 7.0%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $95,146, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,057 compared to $50,575, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $67,333, a difference of 2.2%), and wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.3%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.43%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.48%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.6%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.55%), associate's degree (52.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.9%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.1%).