Immigrants from Austria vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,485,668 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.430% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to an increase of 429.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,503 compared to $50,575, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,140 compared to $111,286, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($95,277 compared to $95,146, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($42,824 compared to $42,446, a difference of 0.89%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,103 compared to $105,085, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 10.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.81%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.40%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (25.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), family households (63.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), and 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%), male disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%).