Crow vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,738,521 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $50,575, a difference of 59.4%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $115,230, a difference of 50.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $111,286, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,294, a difference of 13.4%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $42,446, a difference of 20.4%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $51,246, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 115.0%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 99.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 86.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 32.8%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 248.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 231.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 227.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 68.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 33.0%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.92%), family households (65.3% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 88.6%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 71.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.12%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 33.3%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.020%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%).