Immigrants vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,906,280 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,010 compared to $50,575, a difference of 17.6%), median family income ($100,962 compared to $115,230, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $61,199, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.17%), median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $42,446, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($46,478 compared to $51,246, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 35.6%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 31.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%), female unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.66%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 66.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.030%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%).