Cuban vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,750,931 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $67,333, a difference of 37.0%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $115,230, a difference of 35.6%), and per capita income ($37,383 compared to $50,575, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $53,294, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $42,446, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 83.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 60.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.15%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.67%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 81.9%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 51.3%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%).