Immigrants from Iraq vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,814,979 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Iraq communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iraq within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iraq corresponds to an increase of 16.8 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,365 compared to $50,575, a difference of 22.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,444 compared to $105,085, a difference of 17.5%), and median family income ($98,786 compared to $115,230, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,384 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.17%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and median female earnings ($37,864 compared to $42,446, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.8%), receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father poverty (14.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.040%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.2%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.8%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.14%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 36.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.80%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 47.7%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 43.4%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.81%), 4th grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.3%).