French Canadian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,758,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 7.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,003 compared to $50,575, a difference of 17.6%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $67,333, a difference of 16.1%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $95,146, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $42,446, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.1%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.69%), family households (63.7% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.8%).