Osage vs New Zealander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Osage
New Zealander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Osage
New Zealanders
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
New Zealander Integration in Osage Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,488,745 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 151.5 New Zealanders.
Osage vs New Zealander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $50,575, a difference of 27.8%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $95,146, a difference of 26.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $111,286, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $53,294, a difference of 16.5%), and median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $42,446, a difference of 17.8%).
Income Metric | Osage | New Zealander |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,568 | Exceptional $50,575 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,926 | Exceptional $115,230 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,240 | Exceptional $95,146 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,651 | Exceptional $51,246 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,292 | Exceptional $61,199 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,034 | Exceptional $42,446 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,764 | Exceptional $53,294 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,461 | Exceptional $105,085 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,390 | Exceptional $111,286 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $55,677 | Exceptional $67,333 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 27.7% |
Osage vs New Zealander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.4%), single male poverty (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 12.1%).
Poverty Metric | Osage | New Zealander |
Poverty | Tragic 13.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.5% | Poor 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 24.4% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.6% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Osage vs New Zealander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Osage | New Zealander |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.3% |
Osage vs New Zealander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Osage | New Zealander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.0% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.3% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Fair 82.6% |
Osage vs New Zealander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.3%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.23%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.78%).
Family Structure Metric | Osage | New Zealander |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Tragic 62.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.4% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.1% | Excellent 30.3% |
Osage vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.8%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Osage | New Zealander |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.8% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 6.5% |
Osage vs New Zealander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 61.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.0%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Osage | New Zealander |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 51.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.0% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Osage vs New Zealander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Osage | New Zealander |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.0% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.5% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.5% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.7% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |