Immigrants from Belarus vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,074,463 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.739. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.635% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to an increase of 635.2 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $67,333, a difference of 8.3%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and median female earnings ($44,757 compared to $42,446, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,430 compared to $111,286, a difference of 0.13%), per capita income ($50,303 compared to $50,575, a difference of 0.54%), and median family income ($114,586 compared to $115,230, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 18.3%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.61%), and family households (63.7% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 64.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.6%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.0%).