Immigrants from Pakistan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,231,868 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Pakistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Pakistan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Pakistan corresponds to an increase of 7.2 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,084 compared to $50,575, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($56,789 compared to $53,294, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,434 compared to $111,286, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,987 compared to $61,199, a difference of 0.35%), median family income ($114,406 compared to $115,230, a difference of 0.72%), and median earnings ($51,693 compared to $51,246, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 27.7%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and single female poverty (18.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.79%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.7%), family households with children (30.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (49.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.15, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Pakistan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.67%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.2%).