Choctaw vs New Zealander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Choctaw
New Zealander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Choctaw
New Zealanders
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
New Zealander Integration in Choctaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,616,419 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.444. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 8.8 New Zealanders.
Choctaw vs New Zealander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $50,575, a difference of 40.5%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $95,146, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $115,230, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,294, a difference of 17.3%), and median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $42,446, a difference of 25.7%).
Income Metric | Choctaw | New Zealander |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,999 | Exceptional $50,575 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,835 | Exceptional $115,230 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $69,947 | Exceptional $95,146 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,270 | Exceptional $51,246 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,729 | Exceptional $61,199 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,775 | Exceptional $42,446 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,450 | Exceptional $53,294 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $78,168 | Exceptional $105,085 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,287 | Exceptional $111,286 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,060 | Exceptional $67,333 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 27.7% |
Choctaw vs New Zealander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.4%).
Poverty Metric | Choctaw | New Zealander |
Poverty | Tragic 15.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.4% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.3% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.1% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.5% | Good 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 17.0% | Poor 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 27.2% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 20.7% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 36.4% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Choctaw vs New Zealander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Choctaw | New Zealander |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.3% |
Choctaw vs New Zealander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Choctaw | New Zealander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.4% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.7% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.5% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.2% | Fair 82.6% |
Choctaw vs New Zealander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (46.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Choctaw | New Zealander |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 62.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.9% | Excellent 30.3% |
Choctaw vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 12.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Choctaw | New Zealander |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.2% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.3% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 6.5% |
Choctaw vs New Zealander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 84.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 73.2%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Choctaw | New Zealander |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.8% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.8% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 51.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Choctaw vs New Zealander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.9%).
Disability Metric | Choctaw | New Zealander |
Disability | Tragic 15.4% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.4% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.4% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.7% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |