Chilean vs New Zealander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
New Zealander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
New Zealanders
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
New Zealander Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,643,945 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.731. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 50.7 New Zealanders.
Chilean vs New Zealander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $50,575, a difference of 8.9%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $61,199, a difference of 7.4%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $115,230, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,294, a difference of 0.21%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $42,446, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $111,286, a difference of 4.4%).
Income Metric | Chilean | New Zealander |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Exceptional $50,575 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Exceptional $115,230 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Exceptional $95,146 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Exceptional $51,246 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Exceptional $61,199 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Exceptional $42,446 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Exceptional $53,294 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Exceptional $105,085 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Exceptional $111,286 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Exceptional $67,333 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.7% |
Chilean vs New Zealander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.18%), poverty (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty (12.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | New Zealander |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Good 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Poor 13.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chilean vs New Zealander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | New Zealander |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
Chilean vs New Zealander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.46%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | New Zealander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Fair 82.6% |
Chilean vs New Zealander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.66%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.91%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | New Zealander |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 62.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Excellent 30.3% |
Chilean vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.4%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | New Zealander |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Chilean vs New Zealander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | New Zealander |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Exceptional 51.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Chilean vs New Zealander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | New Zealander |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |