Comanche vs New Zealander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
New Zealander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
New Zealanders
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
New Zealander Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,193,473 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 33.2 New Zealanders.
Comanche vs New Zealander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $50,575, a difference of 32.8%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $115,230, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $111,286, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $53,294, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $42,446, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Comanche | New Zealander |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Exceptional $50,575 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Exceptional $115,230 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Exceptional $95,146 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Exceptional $51,246 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Exceptional $61,199 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Exceptional $42,446 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Exceptional $53,294 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Exceptional $105,085 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Exceptional $111,286 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Exceptional $67,333 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.7% |
Comanche vs New Zealander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 8.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.1%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | New Zealander |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Good 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Poor 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Comanche vs New Zealander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | New Zealander |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.3% |
Comanche vs New Zealander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | New Zealander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Fair 82.6% |
Comanche vs New Zealander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | New Zealander |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 62.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Excellent 30.3% |
Comanche vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | New Zealander |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Good 6.5% |
Comanche vs New Zealander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 68.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.5%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | New Zealander |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 51.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Comanche vs New Zealander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 12.0%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | New Zealander |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |