Immigrants from Moldova vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,624,719 people shows no correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 0.1 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,939 compared to $67,333, a difference of 7.0%), per capita income ($47,489 compared to $50,575, a difference of 6.5%), and wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $42,446, a difference of 0.34%), median earnings ($50,274 compared to $51,246, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($59,417 compared to $61,199, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 21.5%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.2%), family households (64.4% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.73%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.99%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.3%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (93.7% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.82%), disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.2%).