Immigrants from Costa Rica vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,482,768 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,464 compared to $50,575, a difference of 16.4%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $61,199, a difference of 15.0%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $115,230, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $42,446, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $111,286, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.31%), single female poverty (20.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.9%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.5%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 1.3%).