Samoan vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,879,051 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.918. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 27.3 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $50,575, a difference of 27.0%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $61,199, a difference of 19.1%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $51,246, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $53,294, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $67,333, a difference of 2.9%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.6%), single father poverty (13.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.5%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (46.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.1%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 79.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 76.2%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).