Ghanaian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,578,705 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.124% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to an increase of 123.6 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 24.1%), per capita income ($42,164 compared to $50,575, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $105,085, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $53,294, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $42,446, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($46,440 compared to $51,246, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 40.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and family poverty (10.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.27%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.0%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 0.94%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.15, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 61.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.1%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 40.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%).