Jordanian vs New Zealander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,389,295 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 40.9 New Zealanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,605 compared to $50,575, a difference of 10.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $105,085, a difference of 5.9%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $115,230, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $111,286, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $42,446, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $53,294, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 16.7%), single female poverty (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.61%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.8%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.27%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 3.1%).