Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,985,151 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.067. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,742 compared to $37,857, a difference of 52.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($129,122 compared to $85,553, a difference of 50.9%), and median male earnings ($74,031 compared to $49,190, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $50,041, a difference of 18.8%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 23.7%), and median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $36,841, a difference of 33.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 88.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 69.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.0% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 69.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.4%), single father poverty (13.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 30.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 63.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.5%), and births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (68.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 132.3%), professional degree (7.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 117.9%), and master's degree (22.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 97.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (7.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (18.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 8.1%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.7%).