Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,377,005 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 40.6 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,533 compared to $85,553, a difference of 7.0%), per capita income ($40,434 compared to $37,857, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($83,304 compared to $78,327, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $56,722, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $50,041, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 13.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.80%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.33 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.18%), family households (65.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.26%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.76%).