Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,025,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 0.5 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $37,857, a difference of 27.2%), median family income ($109,418 compared to $92,239, a difference of 18.6%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $49,190, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $50,041, a difference of 8.9%), householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $56,722, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $36,841, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 27.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.4%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 47.0%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 60.1%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.1%).