Fijian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,114,903 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 23.8 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $49,190, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $85,553, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $90,909, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $56,722, a difference of 0.080%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,041, a difference of 0.18%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $37,857, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.2%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.43%), female poverty (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and poverty (13.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.5%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.66%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.91%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.66%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.9%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.1% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (94.2% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and 7th grade (94.7% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.0%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.89%).