Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,331,242 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $37,857, a difference of 31.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $85,553, a difference of 29.5%), and median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $49,190, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $50,041, a difference of 12.7%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $56,722, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 39.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 34.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.7%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 76.3%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 69.7%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.0%).