Lumbee vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,129,268 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $50,041, a difference of 44.7%), median household income ($54,644 compared to $78,327, a difference of 43.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $85,553, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 11.7%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $36,841, a difference of 13.4%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $42,884, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 93.5%), single father poverty (28.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 89.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (26.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 73.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 41.5%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 80.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 70.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 31.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.53%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 108.0%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.8%), and bachelor's degree (24.8% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (94.4% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 52.1%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%).