Spanish American vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,225,046 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Spanish American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spanish Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spanish Americans corresponds to an increase of 65.2 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($46,913 compared to $50,041, a difference of 6.7%), median household income ($75,386 compared to $78,327, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,836 compared to $90,909, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,008 compared to $49,190, a difference of 0.37%), householder income over 65 years ($57,021 compared to $56,722, a difference of 0.53%), and median female earnings ($36,391 compared to $36,841, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.9%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 13.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.0%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.94%), ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spanish American and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.2%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.6%).