Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Creek

Immigrants from Laos

Fair
Fair
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Creek Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,635,117 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 20.3 Immigrants from Laos.
Creek Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $78,327, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $90,909, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $85,553, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $49,190, a difference of 5.6%), per capita income ($35,546 compared to $37,857, a difference of 6.5%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $42,884, a difference of 8.2%).
Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricCreekImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,546
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,560
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,715
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,648
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,594
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,437
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,371
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,847
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$78,960
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,949
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
23.8%

Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 31.8%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.3%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricCreekImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Tragic
16.8%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.7%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.8%

Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.94%).
Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCreekImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.9%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.5%

Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCreekImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.3%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.7%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
81.6%

Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.3%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCreekImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Fair
64.2%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.3%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Poor
46.0%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
34.0%

Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.1%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCreekImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 92.1%), bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and associate's degree (37.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricCreekImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.2%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.6%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Creek vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricCreekImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
15.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.5%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.7%