Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,550,092 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.739. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.594% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 594.3 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 28.9%), householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $56,722, a difference of 7.2%), and median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $36,841, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,842 compared to $37,857, a difference of 0.040%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,836 compared to $85,553, a difference of 0.33%), and median family income ($91,763 compared to $92,239, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 32.9%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and single male poverty (15.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 40.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.2%), and unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 0.0%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 112.3%), college, 1 year or more (48.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and college, under 1 year (54.5% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 9th grade (93.3% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and ged/equivalency (82.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 55.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and female disability (13.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.5%).