Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,438,936 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 26.4 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 23.3%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $36,841, a difference of 11.2%), and per capita income ($41,655 compared to $37,857, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $90,909, a difference of 0.49%), median family income ($94,466 compared to $92,239, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $56,722, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 32.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.1%), and receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 31.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.5%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.45%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 190.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 81.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 20.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 44.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 64.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.3%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.38%), college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and high school diploma (86.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 27.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%).