Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ugandans

Immigrants from Laos

Average
Fair
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Ugandan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,484,689 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 43.9 Immigrants from Laos.
Ugandan Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $37,857, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($106,541 compared to $92,239, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $90,909, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.99%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $50,041, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $56,722, a difference of 7.9%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricUgandanImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,047
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,541
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,557
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,854
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,290
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,889
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,923
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,667
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,472
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,177
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.1%
Exceptional
23.8%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.3%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.61%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricUgandanImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Fair
9.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.1%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.4%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.2%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Good
28.8%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
13.8%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 47.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.71%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUgandanImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.5%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUgandanImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.4%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.6%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.4%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
81.6%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUgandanImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.8%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.2%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.1%
Tragic
34.0%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.9%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUgandanImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.8%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricUgandanImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.4%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.0%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.1%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.2%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%

Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricUgandanImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%