Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Laos
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Ugandan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,484,689 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 43.9 Immigrants from Laos.
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,047 compared to $37,857, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($106,541 compared to $92,239, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $90,909, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.99%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $50,041, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $56,722, a difference of 7.9%).
Income Metric | Ugandan | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,047 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,541 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,557 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,854 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,290 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,889 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,923 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,667 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,472 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,177 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.1% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.3%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.61%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Poverty Metric | Ugandan | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.3% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 11.9% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 47.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.71%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Ugandan | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.5% |
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ugandan | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 81.6% |
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.5%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (43.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Ugandan | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Tragic 61.7% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.1% | Tragic 34.0% |
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ugandan | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.8%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Ugandan | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Average 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.1% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.2% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Disability Metric | Ugandan | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |