Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Immigrants from Laos

Fair
Fair
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,947,823 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.450% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 450.4 Immigrants from Laos.
Malaysian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $90,909, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($39,194 compared to $37,857, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $36,841, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($43,844 compared to $42,884, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $56,722, a difference of 2.7%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Exceptional
23.8%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.81%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.8%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Average
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Fair
5.5%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
81.6%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.9%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.030%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Tragic
34.0%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.50%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.8%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (92.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.33%), 11th grade (90.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and 9th grade (93.5% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.4%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%