Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,454,508 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.954% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 953.8 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $37,857, a difference of 29.0%), median family income ($112,038 compared to $92,239, a difference of 21.5%), and median male earnings ($59,527 compared to $49,190, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $50,041, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $36,841, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $56,722, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.9%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.4%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 83.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 63.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.3%).