Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,968,502 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 18.1 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,929 compared to $37,857, a difference of 24.0%), median male earnings ($57,941 compared to $49,190, a difference of 17.8%), and median female earnings ($43,363 compared to $36,841, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $56,722, a difference of 0.70%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,846 compared to $50,041, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 38.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.32%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and poverty (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 39.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.6%), births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 31.9%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.61%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 226.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 112.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 25.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 86.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.6%), master's degree (17.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.2%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.060%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.5%).