Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

COMPARE

Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Serbians

Immigrants from Laos

Excellent
Fair
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Laos Integration in Serbian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,963,633 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Serbian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Serbians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.151% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Serbians corresponds to an increase of 151.2 Immigrants from Laos.
Serbian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Serbian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,551 compared to $37,857, a difference of 23.0%), median male earnings ($57,975 compared to $49,190, a difference of 17.9%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,106 compared to $50,041, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($61,087 compared to $56,722, a difference of 7.7%), and median female earnings ($40,539 compared to $36,841, a difference of 10.0%).
Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Income
Income MetricSerbianImmigrants from Laos
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,551
Tragic
$37,857
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,157
Tragic
$92,239
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,572
Tragic
$78,327
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,677
Tragic
$42,884
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,975
Tragic
$49,190
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,539
Tragic
$36,841
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,106
Tragic
$50,041
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,320
Tragic
$85,553
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,522
Tragic
$90,909
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,087
Tragic
$56,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
23.8%

Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Serbian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.4%).
Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
Poverty MetricSerbianImmigrants from Laos
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
20.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
22.9%
Single Fathers
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.6%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.8%

Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Serbian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSerbianImmigrants from Laos
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.5%

Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Serbian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSerbianImmigrants from Laos
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
40.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.6%

Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Serbian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (63.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSerbianImmigrants from Laos
Family Households
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
45.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
34.0%

Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.3%).
Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSerbianImmigrants from Laos
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
22.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.7%

Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Serbian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.4%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 48.3%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
Education Level MetricSerbianImmigrants from Laos
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
91.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
90.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
86.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.4%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
54.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Tragic
1.4%

Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Serbian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Serbian vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
Disability MetricSerbianImmigrants from Laos
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
26.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%