Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,375 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $56,722, a difference of 14.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $90,909, a difference of 8.7%), and median household income ($84,729 compared to $78,327, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $36,841, a difference of 1.8%), median earnings ($43,673 compared to $42,884, a difference of 1.8%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $49,190, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 13.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.41 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.1%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.23%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 0.050%), associate's degree (40.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.030%), disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%).