Immigrants from Zaire vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,188,854 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Zaire communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zaire within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zaire corresponds to a decrease of 42.4 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,529 compared to $50,041, a difference of 9.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,045 compared to $85,553, a difference of 9.6%), and median household income ($71,801 compared to $78,327, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,017 compared to $36,841, a difference of 2.3%), per capita income ($38,848 compared to $37,857, a difference of 2.6%), and median family income ($89,285 compared to $92,239, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.4%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and female poverty (16.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.38%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.050%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.2%), married-couple households (40.1% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 51.2%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 33.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.0%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.6%).