Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,894,757 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 15.6 Immigrants from Laos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $49,190, a difference of 12.2%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and per capita income ($42,412 compared to $37,857, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $56,722, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $36,841, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $50,041, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 24.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.18%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and single female poverty (21.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.4%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.14%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and currently married (45.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 18.0%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (95.9% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.15%), 6th grade (95.5% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and 7th grade (94.2% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%).