Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Laos
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Laos
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,708,443 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Immigrants from Laos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 84.1 Immigrants from Laos.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $37,857, a difference of 34.5%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $49,190, a difference of 24.9%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $92,239, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $50,041, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $56,722, a difference of 13.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Laos |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Tragic $37,857 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Tragic $92,239 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Tragic $78,327 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Tragic $42,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Tragic $49,190 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Tragic $36,841 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Tragic $50,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Tragic $85,553 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Tragic $90,909 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Tragic $56,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 23.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.1%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Laos |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 19.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Laos |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Excellent 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.5% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 40.6%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Laos |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 40.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 48.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 2.0%), currently married (46.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (62.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Laos |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 34.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 48.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Laos |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 22.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 80.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 73.2%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Laos |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 93.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Tragic 91.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Tragic 90.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 82.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Tragic 61.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 54.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Tragic 40.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 31.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Laos Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Laos communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.2%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Laos |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 49.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |